Kansas
City Club
October 17, 2002
Happy Fourth of July to you all!
Distinguished Guests:
As people who appreciate writers, books and libraries you may have
heard the story about Charles Dickens’ fake books, but please
indulge me a moment to retell it. In 1851, Dickens moved into Tavistock
House, the home of his dreams in Dublin. To insure the privacy of
his study, he had the doorway camouflaged with shelves of dummy
books so that it disappeared into the adjacent library’s wall
of bookshelves. Poking fun at libraries and, for that matter, humanity,
Dickens gave his fake books some wry titles. One was called Cat’s
Lives (in nine volumes, of course). Another, called The
History of a Short Chancery Suit, sprawling over 21 volumes.
Another set of books, The Wisdom of Our Ancestors, included
the titles Ignorance, Superstition, Dirt, Disease, The Block
and The Stake. The Virtues of Our Ancestors, however, was so
slender that the title was printed sideways on the spine. Then there
was a three-volume magnus opus entitled Five Minutes in China…
Tonight, I am deeply honored to be here in Kansas City to talk about
real books and the importance of public libraries. I also want to
pay tribute to you for building a magnificent new main library.
I understand that, once you finish restoring this edifice in the
Greco-Roman style, it will virtually be a temple to honor knowledge—doubling
the number of library holdings accessible to the public, providing
space for exhibitions, recitals, lectures and, as if all that were
not sufficiently stimulating, a place for a café on the mezzanine
floor. With many others here tonight, I too believe the new library
will grace the city, help stimulate a downtown renaissance and—most,
most importantly—be better able to play its central role in
the cultural, intellectual and democratic life of the entire metropolitan
community. To the extent that citizens see that statement as novel
or far-fetched—is, from my experience—a rough gauge
of the challenge you face in transforming public appreciation into
active political support—the kind of support needed for the
library to become a regional project, steaming with civic pride
and fueling the engine of urban and metropolitan renewal.
That
Kansas City faces a major challenge is suggested by the recent report
on the region by the urban affairs specialists Curtis Johnson and
Neal Pierce.
These
authors mention the library—which serves more than two million
citizens a year—only in passing. The well-intended authors
did not even include the library in their map of the area’s
“assets.” To be sure, the map’s purpose is to
highlight the distance and disconnection between major resources—but
looked at another way, the map serves as a graphic display of the
need for the library to become, in effect, the mind of this urban
body that sprawls mindlessly across state borders and a dozen county
lines. The Kansas City Library, after all, is the most natural,
capable and democratic institution for centering and connecting
these diverse communities through the free and open provision of
information, entertainment, culture and knowledge.
Kansas
City is joining other cities in rediscovering the importance of
libraries as the communities’ institutional minds and hearts.
New main libraries have recently been built or renovated in San
Antonio, Phoenix, Denver, San Francisco, Sacramento and Portland,
Oregon. The Chicago Public Library is completing one of the world’s
largest public library capital improvement programs, which includes
13 new construction projects and the renovation or replacement of
most of its branch libraries.
Overall,
last year, 80 more libraries were built and 132 were renovated,
bringing the nation’s investment in library improvements close
to $4 billion since the mid-1990s, according to the American Library
Association. The association says we have more than 16,000 free
public libraries, or more sources for books and computers than McDonald’s
has franchises for Happy Meals. And, believe it or not, Americans
go to libraries more than twice as often as they go to the movies.
In the last year, as the economy slowed, library visits also increased
by 8.3 percent. Yet the cost of using the library works out to only
about $23 a year for the average taxpayer.
One reason
for their popularity is that our libraries are continually expanding
and enriching their services. In Kansas City, 4th to 12th grade
students can receive help with homework from online tutors. In St.
Louis, Missouri, “cybermobiles” bring the Internet and
online reference services into many neighborhoods. In Philadelphia,
the Free Library faxes articles and other information to homes and
offices. In Detroit, you can obtain a copy of a patent far more
quickly than from the U.S. Patent Office. In San Francisco, the
new library provides 400 electronic work stations and has capacity
for 700 more.
Libraries
are leading the effort to close the digital divide, as nearly every
public library provides free access to the Internet; in fact, libraries
are the number one point of online access for people who lack computers
and Internet accounts.
In the
main, libraries have shown remarkable resilience in the face of
repeated challenges to their viability and a remarkable ability
to transform themselves to meet changing needs. They continue to
adapt to one of the most astonishing shifts in the technology of
communication ever to take place: the rapidly spreading use of networked
computers bringing vast amounts of information and misinformation
directly to the home, school and office. The breathtaking pace of
these developments has led some proponents of the Internet to wonder
whether brick-and-mortar libraries are any longer relevant. Never
fear. Libraries have always found a way to fit new media to their
fundamental purposes and become indispensable.
Not surprisingly,
nearly all Americans surveyed by Gallup in 1998 said libraries would
be needed in the future, despite the increased availability of information
from the computer.
At the
same time, we must deal with the reality that libraries are often
taken for granted and their significance as living institutions
is sometimes forgotten.
This
was certainly the case in New York in the late 1970s, when Andew
Heiskell became chairman of the New York Public Library’s
board of directors and recruited me to become president in 1981.
In describing the challenges the library faced back then, he writes:
“When I first signed up to help the New York Public Library,
it had almost no reputation left to protect. During the 1970s, New
York City came so close to bankruptcy that it had to cut back on
everything. It cut back savagely on funds for the library because
in those days the library had no political clout. It had no constituency
except scholars, children and ordinary citizens who liked to read.…The
city cut back so hard on the library that some of the branches were
open only eight hours a week. Some librarians had to scurry from
building to building trying to service three branches in one week.
The marble inside the main Fifth Avenue building, the one with the
great sculpted lions guarding the broad front steps, was so filthy
brown that you would never guess it was marble….
“The
chandeliers and lighting fixtures all through the main building
were dirty and had only two or three bulbs in each. The beautiful
Celeste Bartos Forum, now the library’s most important meeting
place, had been turned into a warehouse. The gorgeous Gottesman
Exhibition Hall had been divided by Masonite partitions into tiny
offices for personnel and accounting. The only decent room in the
entire building was the board room, but even there the tall curtains
fell apart if you touched them….Inside this building were
more than three million books, many of them extremely valuable,
gathering dust and crumbling away in stacks that were not air-conditioned.
The library had begged for air conditioning for 20 years, but nothing
happened.”
That
is the way it was: under-funded, under-appreciated and with many
of its 100 buildings falling apart and inadequately staffed. The
library’s constituents—as library constituents almost
everywhere—were unorganized and not vocal. As a result, politicians
took it for granted that the libraries were not priorities and that
library budgets could be slashed with impunity.
To meet
the library’s needs, we produced a wish list that would cost
$1 billion.
To be
realistic, we scaled the list down to $307 million worth of top-priority
items.
When
we announced a capital fund campaign, there were exclamations of
disbelief, but five years later, the goal was exceeded with public
and private funds—not to mention more than $50 million worth
of donated equipment, services and other in-kind gifts. We were
able to increase the endowment, collections, hours, and services
for both research libraries and branch libraries. But I was most
proud to witness the library’s revival as the “people’s
palace”—reaffirming its central place in the city’s
civic and cultural life.
It wasn’t
easy, of course. Early on, a major challenge was to mobilize all
segments of society to support the library’s renewal by reminding
them that libraries are necessities, not luxuries. As part of the
effort to get this message out, we strengthened the library’s
departments for government relations and public relations. We told
our story everywhere, to officials in the city, state, and federal
governments as well as to countless organizations, foundations and
individual philanthropists. Instead of asking for small sums, as
had been done in past, we asked for very big sums, noting that other,
equally deserving cultural institutions had traditionally received
much more support than the library. We showed that the library was
not an isolated, passive institution but an active one with a lot
of impact.
After
all, the library is not a book warehouse, but a educational institution—and
we underscored that role by holding lecture series, exhibitions
and celebrations for writers and cultural figures whose creations,
records and books were in the library. We computerized holdings,
helping to democratize access to information and knowledge.
Whenever
we could, we demonstrated that libraries mean education, libraries
mean consolation, libraries mean culture and libraries mean jobs.
We stressed that libraries are not only for the poor, the helpless
and children without books. Rather, we showed that the libraries
were for the benefit of the entire society—helping all the
educational institutions, all the professions and all the businesses.
We pointed out that the library’s vast repository of information
and knowledge was constantly being tapped by just about any industry
you can think of, including advertising, film and television. Lawyers
use the patent collections extensively, reporters use the periodicals
department, airlines use the maps department, families look up genealogical
records.
We were
gratified that we were successful in building coalitions and making
joint public/private partnerships and agreements on how money would
be spent.
By the
mid-1980s, our media campaigns were generating more than 3,000 mentions
a year in the national media.
We encountered
criticism, but that is to be expected. We were, for example, criticized
for spending money to clean the main library. We felt the money
was well spent because we wanted to show off the building, to reawaken
civic pride in what was built to be a magnificent tribute to the
people and city of New York, the state and the nation. We wanted
restore its luster as the people’s palace, because we believed
that democracy and excellence are not mutually exclusive. We were
also criticized for opening a library gift shop and for having social
events and fundraisers at the public library. But these activities
are in line with the library’s role at the center of the city’s
cultural life. During my years at the library, we honored more than
175 authors, ranging from Renata Adler to Herman Wouk. We celebrated
them at Literary Lions Dinners once a year, catered right in the
restored reading rooms of the library.
Twenty-one
authors dined with library patrons at 21 tables, for which sponsors
had contributed $10,000 to $25,000 each. The authors signed and
gave away copies of their books, which their publishers donated.
After dinner, we often had an actor perform a dramatic reading of
a literary work.
But we
didn’t rely entirely on the social elite; every year, for
example, we held a two-day holiday party to welcome citizens to
their library, thank them for their support and encourage their
contributions.
But
supporting the library is a never-ending struggle, so librarians
can’t be shy about tooting their own horn. This year, New
York City is again having major financial problems and the mayor
proposed a 15 percent reduction in library funding—even as
demand for library services grew. In 2001, library visits had increased
by 12 percent and book circulation had increased by 19 percent over
the prior year. Arguing against the reduction—in an editorial
I myself could not have written any better—The New York
Times called for the city to find money to—quote—“soften
the blow to one of the most vital, well-loved parts of city government.”
Thanks to greater public awareness and support for the library,
the blow was ultimately softened, to a 6.5 percent reduction.
Across
America we are coming to realize the library’s unsurpassed
importance as a civic institution. The library contains a society’s
collective but discriminating memory. It is an act of honor to the
past, a witness to the future, hence a visible judgment on both.
In our
democratic society, the library stands for hope, for learning, for
progress, for literacy, for self-improvement and for civic engagement.
The library is a symbol of opportunity, citizenship, equality, freedom
of speech and freedom of thought, and hence, is a symbol for democracy
itself. It is a critical component in the free exchange of information,
which is at the heart of our democracy. In both an actual and symbolic
sense, the library is the guardian of freedom of thought and freedom
of choice; hence it constitutes the best symbol of the First Amendment
to our Constitution.
We must
not forget the library’s critical role in dispelling ignorance
about our nation’s history and the ideals, traditions and
purposes of our democracy. “A nation that expects to be ignorant
and free,” warned Thomas Jefferson, “expects what never
was and never will be.”
The
free library is, in the words of Andrew Carnegie, “the cradle
of democracy,” and he backed up that belief by building 1,681
public libraries in nearly as many American communities and another
828 libraries abroad. I should mention that my fellow educators—librarians,
information scientists and all communicators of culture and creators
of knowledge—continue to rock this cradle of democracy, even
as it moves into cyberspace.
Libraries
contain the heritage of humanity, the record of its triumphs and
failures, its intellectual, scientific and artistic achievements
and its collective memory. They are a source of knowledge, scholarship
and wisdom. They are an institution, withal, where the left and
the right, God and the Devil, are together classified and retained,
in order to teach us what to emulate and what not to repeat.
Libraries
are, thus, the most tolerant institutions we have, the good and
the evil are here, and the library makes no value judgments about
them. As the poet Richard Armour writes, libraries are where people
“lower their voices and raise their minds.”
By seeing
so many examples in libraries, by comparing and knowing about right
and wrong, one comes to appreciate shades in history, nuances in
history, possibilities and limitations. As a result, one becomes
more able to understand other people’s positions, knowing
how arduously they have come to those positions, even though they
may be wrong.
Libraries
are as old as civilization, the object of pride, envy and sometimes,
senseless destruction throughout the ages.
The renowned
library at Alexandria, Egypt, was the first institution based on
the premise that all the world’s knowledge could be gathered
under one roof. It was founded by in about 300 B.C. by Ptolemy I,
who sent agents to all the cities of Asia, North Africa and Europe
to collect copies of all books that existed in the known world.
The library, and its 700,000 volumes, was destroyed in the seventh
century A.D. But for nine luminous centuries, Alexandria was a place
of inspiration, a symbol of the unity of knowledge and scholarship
and of the limitless potential of human advancement.
Between
the clay tablets of ancient Babylon and the computers of a modern
library stretch more than 5,000 years of man’s and woman’s
insatiable desire to ensure their immortality through the written
word or symbol.
Instinctively,
we want to transmit the fruits of culture and civilization, and
to share memory, experience, wisdom, fantasy, and longing with the
whole of humankind and with future generations.
The modern
library allows one to go five thousand years into the past to try
to cope with the present—and also to imagine, to fantasize
about the future. It gives you a sense of the cosmic relation to
the totality of humanity, but at the same time a sense of isolation.
Here is the human endeavor, human aspiration, human agony, human
ecstasy, human bravura, human failures, all before you. Humanity
has gone through dreadful horrors, dreadful turmoil, varied glories.
How do we distill the past? How do we retain the memories? Libraries.
One gets
thrilled and frightened at the same time in the presence of a library.
During the past 20 years, with the advent of the computer age, we
have been undergoing another historical revolutionary shift equal
to that of previous revolutionary changes. The computer—with
its gain in portability, capability, ease, orderliness, accuracy,
reliability and information storage capacity—supersedes anything
achievable by pen scribbling, typewriting and cabinet filing, and
is recognized by all.
The new
information technologies are the driving force behind the explosion
of information and the fragmentation of knowledge that we witness
today. We are told that all available information doubles every
three years and yet, we are able only to use less than ten percent
of the available information.
The
information technologies have shrunk the traditional barriers of
time and space, giving us the ability to record, organize and quickly
communicate vast amounts of information. Today the entire corpus
of Greek and Latin literature can fit on a CD-ROM and be carried
inconspicuously in a jacket pocket. We face, for the first time
in history of mankind, the ability of providing each and every individual
his or her own Library of Alexandria.
The greatest
challenge facing us today is how to organize information into structured
knowledge. We must rise above the obsession with quantity of information
and the speed of transmission. We must focus on the fact that the
key issue for us is our ability to organize the information once
it has been amassed, to assimilate it, to find meaning in it and
to assure its survival. And that cannot be done without librarians
and libraries.
In the
decade ahead, our democracy and our society will be facing a major
challenge. Many, in our society, will have access to information
and knowledge—and hence access to power; the power of autonomy,
power of enlightenment, power of self-improvement and self-assertion,
and power over their lives and their families’ future. And
there will be others who will have no access to information.
Such
a cleavage will have tremendous consequences on the future of our
nation. Our nation cannot afford to have one-fifth of its population
being illiterate. For reading is a means to education; education
is a means to knowledge; knowledge is a means to power and a bright
future. Those who learn to read and write do so not only for themselves
and their families, but our nation as well. They learn in order
to become good citizens and good ancestors. That is why reading
and the love of libraries and books has to begin in the earliest
stages of education. School libraries constitute an indispensable
introduction to literacy and learning about the world and the universe.
They are pathways to self-discovery. They are tools for progress
and autonomy.
Even
in this age of the computer and information revolution, microchips,
lasers, fiber optics, and other technological elaborations, the
raw input is still human speech, human idiosyncrasy and literacy.
Libraries are still indispensable tools. They provide pleasure,
discretion, silence, creative solitude, and privacy. Reading universalizes
us, especially now when the computer has brought us the death of
distance.
The
library, then, is the University of Universities, the symbol of
our universal community, of the unity of all knowledge, of the commonwealth
of learning. It is the only true and free university there is. In
this university there are no entrance examinations, no subsequent
examinations, no diplomas, no graduation. Ralph Waldo Emerson had
it right when he called the library the People’s University.
By the same token, no university in the world has ever risen to
greatness without having a great library, and no university is greater
than its library, and no city is greater than its library.
That
is because, I believe, libraries represent and embody the spirit
of humanity, a spirit that has been extolled throughout history
by countless writers, artists, scholars, philosophers, theologians,
scientists, teachers and ordinary men and women in a myriad of tongues
and dialects.
Above
all else, the library constitutes an act of faith in the continuity
of life. The library is not, therefore, an ossified institution
or a historical relic.
Together
with the museum, the library is the DNA of our culture. Libraries
are the mirror held up to the face of humankind, the diary and textbook
of the human race.
The existence
and the welfare of the library are of paramount importance in the
life of a society, in the life of a community, the life of a university,
the life of a school and a college, the life of a city and the life
of a nation.
But libraries
are more than repositories of past human endeavor, they are instruments
of civilization. They are a laboratory of human aspiration, a window
to the future and a wellspring of action. They are a source of intellectual
growth, and hope. In this land and everywhere on earth, they are
a medium of progress, autonomy, empowerment, independence and self-determination.
They have always provided—and I would suggest, always will
provide—a place and space for imaginative recreation, for
imaginative rebirth. That is because the library is a transcendent
institution, being able to surpass the limitations of time and space.
The library is an oasis, a place for reflection, for contemplation,
for privacy, for the renewal of one’s imagination and the
development of one’s mind.
Libraries
are vehicles for self-renewal.
In his book, Love in the Time of Cholera, Gabriel Garcia
Marquez speaks of the conviction that human beings are not born
once and for all on the day their mothers give birth to them, but
that life obliges them to give birth to themselves over and over
again. This is also true of libraries. They have to renew themselves
because information is constantly changing and knowledge is constantly
being renewed. And the same could be said about cities: they are
not created once and for all time, but must recreate themselves
to survive and thrive.
I would
like close by congratulating you once more for your support and
your work on behalf of the library, the downtown and the region—for
the rebirth of the library in its refurbished Greco-Roman temple
is an extremely good omen for America and Americans everywhere.
Thank
you very much.
The
end