|
Publications & Multimedia
Progress Report
Jane
E. Holl
Executive Director
July 1995
Table
of Contents
Carnegie
Corporation of New York established the Carnegie Commission on Preventing
Deadly Conflict in May 1994 to address the looming threats to world
peace of intergroup violence and to advance new ideas for the prevention
and resolution of deadly conflict. The Commission is examining the
principal causes of deadly ethnic, nationalist, and religious conflicts
within and between states and the circumstances that foster or deter
their outbreak. Taking a long-term, worldwide view of violent conflicts
that are likely to emerge, it is seeking to determine the functional
requirements of an effective system for preventing mass violence
and to identify the ways in which such a system could be implemented.
The Commission is also looking at the strengths and weaknesses of
various international entities in conflict prevention and considering
ways in which international organizations might contribute toward
developing an effective international system of nonviolent problem
solving.
Additional copies of this report may be obtained free of charge
from the Commission's headquarters:
Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict
2400 N Street, N.W.
Sixth Floor
Washington, D.C. 20037-1153
Tel.: (202) 429-7979 Fax: (202) 429-9291
E-mail: pdc%carnegie@mcimail.com
The Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict was established
by Carnegie Corporation of New York in 1994 with a three-year mandate
to examine the causes of deadly conflict in the post--Cold War era
and to offer judgments on how the international community might
do better in preventing these conflicts. With its first year completed,
this international commission has established an agenda that is
at once deliberately visionary and strongly committed to finding
practical ways to prevent incipient conflict from turning into mass
violence.
This task is daunting. Successful prevention is hard to measure,
yet most observers agree that preventing such disasters as those
now plaguing the Balkans, parts of Africa, and the Caucasus is far
superior than having to deal with their consequences. The question
is: How?
To understand the task of prevention as fully as possible, the members
of the Commission have undertaken an ambitious program of research
and consultation covering a wide range of regions and actors on
the international stage. To augment its own work, the Commission
has identified skilled and experienced scholars and practitioners
and has asked them to undertake studies of specific current conflicts
and of efforts to resolve these conflicts; the results of these
studies will be published by the Commission. The Commission has
also identified several areas that have been underexplored thus
far--such as improving policing practices to help maintain civil
order--for detailed examination by experts.
This report appears in outline form to give the reader easier access
to the ideas and programs being pursued by the Commission and by
others on its behalf. Following an overview of the Commission's
mandate, the report highlights the conceptual framework that structures
the Commission's approach and outlines the work in progress by commissioners
and outside experts to address the issues raised in each part of
the conceptual framework; future projects are also described. Over
the course of its life, the Commission will publish reports and
disseminate policy recommendations resulting from the work it has
generated; it expects to issue its final report in 1997.
The Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict began operation
in May 1994. Established by Carnegie Corporation of New York, its
mandate is to address the looming threats to world peace posed by
intergroup violence and to advance ideas for the prevention and
more rapid resolution of deadly conflict. The Commission is co-chaired
by Carnegie Corporation president David A. Hamburg and Cyrus R.
Vance, former U.S. secretary of state. The Commission, which meets
quarterly, is composed of sixteen eminent international leaders
and scholars who have long experience in conflict prevention and
resolution. Members of the Commission and its Advisory Board are
listed on pages 21-23.
For the Commission's main purposes, "deadly conflict"
means "mass violence"--those situations where conflict
and strife can lead, and have led, to outbreaks of violence, expulsion,
and slaughter on a massive scale or targeted against specific populations.
We have in mind a wide range of circumstances, including those where
the hatreds and fears of groups are exploited in violent ways by
political opportunists and those where the potential for uncontrolled
possession of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons menaces
the lives of millions.
Preventing the world's deadly conflicts is a complex undertaking
that requires a concerted effort by a wide range of actors. The
Commission does not mean to promote preventive strategies as easy,
reflexive, or cost-free palliatives to the global illness of violence.
Effective prevention requires a long-term, structural approach with
policies that promote democratization, economic reform, education,
and cross-cultural communication. But it also, at times, demands
immediate operational steps to build a firebreak against the outbreak
and spread of mass violence. Either way, at root, prevention means
action, and action entails costs, and costs demand tradeoffs. Thus,
no effort to help avert mass violence is easy, cheap, or without
controversy.
But when it comes to preventing mass violence, the record of conflict
in the twentieth century--or even the post-Cold War period alone--is
enough to convince us that we can surely do better.
To offer some modest judgments on how we can do better, the Commission
has adopted a three-part conceptual approach that serves both as
a strategic framework for thinking about preventing mass violence
and as an analytic structure to guide its substantive work. This
conceptual approach may be summarized as follows:
I. What is the problem posed by "deadly conflict" within
or between states? Why is outside help necessary to deal with this
problem?
II. How should we structure that help? What political, economic,
military, or social tools are at the disposal of the international
community? What is the relationship between and among these tools--especially
now, in the post-Cold War world? Can a more coherent approach or
system for using these tools in a discriminating, selective way
be devised as a more effective means of preventing mass violence?
III. Who should do the work? What should be the role of the international
institutions and regional organizations? What prerogatives for action
are individual states likely to retain? What responsibilities for
preventing mass violence do these prerogatives suggest? How can
the vast resources that exist in the private sector--for example,
in nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), the media, religious groups,
and the business community--be employed more effectively and coordinated
with governmental responses?
The members of the Commission have already undertaken a good deal
of work in an effort to offer some answers to the questions raised
above. In addition, the Commission has asked for work by a substantial
number of scholars and other experts to help inform its judgment
on these issues. The Commission also sponsors conferences around
the world, convenes seminars, and actively participates in the work
of others that relates to its core agenda. Moreover, the Carnegie
Corporation program for Preventing Deadly Conflict provides longer
term research and project support for efforts that complement the
agenda of the Commission. The following sections elaborate some
of the key issues associated with each part of the conceptual framework
and outline work in progress and in planning that relates to these
issues.
Objectives
- Define
the scope of potential mass violence and its international consequences
Issues
- What
conditions generate the greatest potential for violence?
-
-
How
do we predict reliably where mass violence will occur?
-
How
can priorities for preventive action be established?
-
What
are some guiding principles for taking preventive action in
different types of situations? How do we reconcile imperatives
for intervention with norms of state sovereignty?
-
How
does the international need for action intersect with the national
interests of states?
Work
In Progress
- A
study to develop a doctrinal rationale for prevention
-
-
A
project to compile and compare various motivations for preventive
action
-
An
examination of failed states and their process of decline and
an analysis of opportunities to prevent the emergence of violence
associated with decline
-
Case
studies of possible "missed opportunities" in the
former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Nagorno--Karabakh, Chechnya, and
Somalia
-
A
commissioned piece on the imperative for political leadership
to ensure effective prevention, including ways to respond that
do not involve the use of brute force
-
A
high-level meeting to offer a policy prescription for preventing
further violence in Rwanda and Burundi
Future
Projects
Future work includes case studies on successful efforts in prevention
and an examination of possible moral and ethical aspects of prevention
efforts.
Objectives
- To
identify the political, diplomatic, economic, military, and
social tools available to help prevent deadly conflict
Issues
- What
tools can be helpful for preventing different types of deadly
conflict?
-
-
- Information
and early warning. Information networks that would identify
and monitor "hot spots" and provide early warning
of intensifying danger, including such indicators as gross
human rights abuses, massive population migrations, and
the buildup of weapons--including reliable mechanisms for
illuminating specific regional problems as well as global
patterns.
-
-
Forums
for discussion, analysis, and advocacy. Visible, respected
forums for discussion of disputed issues by all relevant
parties, for drawing the world's attention to the basic
facts of the dispute in a responsible way, and for engaging
policymakers and publics as receptor sites for early warning,
analysis, and potential response.
-
Institutions/processes
for indigenous nonviolent conflict resolution. Institutions
for negotiation and adjudication where people air grievances,
discuss conflicts, and engage in democratic ways of coping
with disagreements. Processes for joint problem solving
in which representatives of contending groups can explore
how their interests, basic needs, and aspirations compete
as well as intersect with such potentially shared goals
as regional economic development and building democratic
institutions.
-
Incentives/sanctions
to encourage nonviolent dispute resolution. An array
of political, diplomatic, economic, cultural, technological,
and psychological pressures and inducements that could be
applied effectively to influence potential belligerents
towards peaceful settlement of disputes before their actions
escalate into mass violence.
-
Rapidly
deployable and fair mechanisms for conflict resolution.
Mechanisms that can be brought to bear promptly, such as
envoys and fact-finding missions, are recognized as legitimate,
and are supported by the authority and policies of those
states/institutions that deploy them.
-
An
adaptable, credible military force to help deter or limit
mass violence. The ability to use or threaten more forceful
measures, under certain circumstances, to strengthen preventive
strategies.
-
How
effective are existing tools for preventing deadly conflict?
What adaptations are necessary to develop effective strategies
for long-term stability (structural prevention)? To improve
the efficacy of immediate action (operational prevention)? Can
they be applied affordably on a scale sufficient to be effective?
-
How
do we think more effectively about tools such as human rights,
humanitarian aid, and economic assistance in the service of
prevention?
-
How
can we broaden our understanding of how technological solutions
might help alleviate circumstances that contribute to mass violence?
Work
In Progress
- A
project to propose improvements in national and international
infrastructure to enhance the use of sanctions as a deterrent
-
-
Case
studies, leading to an edited volume, on the role of incentives
in prevention
-
A
study on multilateral uses of force to prevent deadly conflict
(in collaboration with the Atlantic Council)
-
A
conference and volume (in collaboration with the Department
of Social Sciences at the U.S. Military Academy) on the role
and use of force in preventing deadly conflict
-
A
study on the use of nonlethal technologies in preventing deadly
conflict
-
An
examination of how science and technology might help alleviate
circumstances that contribute to mass violence
-
An
examination of how policing practices and civil order techniques
can be improved and employed to help prevent deadly conflict
-
A
study of comparative power-sharing arrangements and their suitability
for use in badly divided societies for promoting political alternatives
to violence
-
A
study of "peacebuilding" to develop a greater understanding
of how to enhance indigenous capacity to avoid mass violence
-
A
reconsideration of the findings of the report of the 1983*R
Commission on Economic and Social Development to determine how
strategies of sustainable development contribute to conflict
prevention
-
An
August 1995 conference in Cyprus on reconceiving security in
the Middle East
-
Case
studies on preventing the reemergence of violence in Tajikistan,
El Salvador, and Cambodia
-
Case
studies on the role of ad hoc coalitions or "friends"
groups for dealing with incipient conflict
-
A
study of how groups in conflict within South Africa, Northern
Ireland, and the Basque region of Spain learn from each other's
experience in turning away from violence
-
A
study of Russia's role in its "near-abroad"
-
A
study of the unprecedented deployment of UN peacekeepers to
Macedonia
-
A
project to examine the "early warning response" problem
to develop ways both to ensure adequate warning of potential
mass violence and to promote an early and effective international
response to such warning
Future
Projects
Future projects include a study of "lessons learned" for
prevention from missed opportunities in Cyprus and Northern Ireland;
a study of the circumstances that contribute to outbreaks of violence
against minority groups and strategies for preventing such violence;
a study of the environment-security nexus; an examination of ways
to enhance the UN's capacity to deploy envoys or special representatives
to conflict areas, and a study of the role of law in preventing
deadly conflict.
Objectives
- To
understand ways to improve the relationship between and among
states, international institutions, regional organizations,
and groups in the private sector (including NGOs, the media,
religious groups, and the business community) in preventing
deadly conflict
Issues
- What
should be the role of the international institutions and regional
organizations?
-
-
How
do rights, authorities, and legitimacy for action derive?
-
What
prerogatives for action are individual states likely to retain?
What responsibilities for preventing mass violence do these
prerogatives suggest?
-
Who
pays?
-
How
do the various actors in the private sector, e.g., NGOs, the
media, religious groups, and the business community, currently
address themselves to preventing deadly conflict?
-
What
roles can these actors play? For example, what interests does
the business community have in stable international markets?
What responsibilities for the maintenance of that stability
do these interests suggest? How can these actors discharge their
responsibilities in constructive ways?
Work
In Progress
- An
August 1995 conference in Jerusalem on the role of religion
in deadly conflict, and a book on the conference (in collaboration
with the Joan B.Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies
at the University of Notre Dame)
-
-
A
paper on the Norwegian model for governmental-NGO cooperation
in conflict resolution and humanitarian relief
-
A
seminar and discussion in September 1995 at the 4th World Conference
on Women in Beijing on the grassroots and transnational roles
of women in preventing deadly conflict
-
A
meeting series (in collaboration with Business Executives for
National Security) and study on the role of the business community
in preventing deadly conflict
-
A
Task Force on UN-NGO coordination in humanitarian and peacekeeping
efforts
-
An
examination of how the role of established democracies in preventing
deadly conflict might be enhanced
-
A
study of the development of European regional institutions and
their suitability for maintaining stability and preventing the
emergence of mass violence (in collaboration with RAND)
-
A
study of the role of the media in deadly conflict and its potential
preventive uses
-
A
feasibility study on UN regional centers for conflict prevention
Future
Projects
Future projects include expanded work on the role of NGOs; case
studies on the role of business; an examination of the role of education
for the prevention of deadly conflict; a study on ways to strengthen
international legal institutions; and detailed examinations of the
developing role of the Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe (OSCE), the Organization for African Unity (OAU), and
the Organization of American States (OAS) in conflict prevention.
The Commission expects to issue several dozen reports. To date,
it has released one publication: a discussion paper, "Comprehensive
Disclosure of Fissile Materials: A Suggested Initiative," was
timed to coincide with the April-May 1995 Non-Proliferation Treaty
Review Conference in New York. Several publications are in press:
- "Preventing
Deadly Conflict: Rationale and Approach," a paper by David
Hamburg, the Commission's co-chair
-
-
"Promoting
Democracy in the 1990s: Actors and Instruments, Issues and Imperatives,"
a paper prepared for the Commission by Larry Diamond, a senior
research fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University,
and co-editor of the Journal of Democracy
-
"Alternatives
to a UN Standing Army," a paper by General Andrew J. Goodpaster,
a member of the Comission's distinguished Advisory Board
Reports are available free of charge. To be added to our mailing
list or to receive copies of specific publications, please fax or
mail the form on page 25 to the Commission's offices.
APPENDIX
BIOGRAPHIES OF COMMISSIONERS
David
A. Hamburg, co-chair of the Commission, has been president of
Carnegie Corporation of New York since 1983. In addition to holding
academic posts at Stanford and Harvard universities, he has been
president of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences.
He has also been president and chairman of the board of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science. Dr. Hamburg has served
on the Chief of Naval Operations Executive Panel and currently serves
on the Defense Policy Board of the U.S. Department of Defense. He
is also a member of the President's Committee of Advisors on Science
and Technology. He has long been concerned with the problems of
human aggression and violence, especially with violence prevention
and conflict resolution, and he is the author or co-author of numerous
publications on these subjects.
Cyrus
R. Vance, co-chair of the Commission, is a partner in the New
York law firm of Simpson Thacher & Bartlett. Mr. Vance was U.S.
secretary of state from 1977 to 1980 during the Carter administration.
He was secretary of the army from 1962 to 1964 and deputy secretary
of defense from 1964 to 1967. From 1991 to 1993 Mr. Vance served
as personal envoy of the secretary-general of the United Nations
in the Yugoslavia crisis and as UN co-chairman of the International
Conference on the Former Yugoslavia (Lord Owen was the European
Community co-chairman of the conference). In 1992, Mr Vance was
also a personal envoy of the secretary-general in Nagorno-Karabakh
and in South Africa. He has served as special representative of
the president in civil disturbances in Detroit (1967), in the Cyprus
crisis (1967), and in Korea (1968), and he was one of two U.S. negotiators
at the Paris Peace Conference on Vietnam (1968-1969).
Gro
Harlem Brundtland, the first woman prime minister of Norway,
has served in that position three times: from February to October
1981, from May 1986 to October 1989, and from November 1990 to the
present. She has been a member of the Storting (parliament) since
1977 and was minister of the environment from 1974 to 1979. Mrs.
Brundtland was leader of the Norwegian Labour Party from 1981 to
1992. She is first vice president of the Socialist International
and was a member of the Independent Commission on Disarmament and
Security Issues (the Palme Commission). From 1983 to 1987, she chaired
the World Commission on Environment and Development, which produced
the influential report Our Common Future.
Virendra
Dayal is a member of the National Human Rights Commission of
India. In 1965 Mr. Dayal joined the office of the United Nations
High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), where for the next fourteen
years he was involved in the management of operations to protect
and assist refugees in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and the Middle
East. In 1979 he was appointed Director of the Office of Special
Political Affairs in the offices of the Secretary-General, and in
1982 Secretary-General PÍrez de Cuellar asked him to serve as his
Chef de Cabinet, with the rank of Under Secretary General. He continued
to serve in this capacity with both PÍrez de Cuellar and Boutros-Ghali
until March 1992, when he retired. After his retirement, he assisted
Boutros-Ghali in writing An Agenda for Peace, and in September
1992 he visited South Africa as the Secretary-General's personal
envoy. In October 1993, Mr. Dayal was appointed by the President
of India to a five-year term on the National Human Rights Commission
of India.
Gareth
Evans has been foreign minister of Australia since 1988. First
elected to Parliament in 1977, he has been reelected three times,
most recently in 1993. A barrister who became Queen's Counsel in
1983, Senator Evans served in several ministerial positions before
becoming foreign minister. In 1989 he chaired the inaugural ministerial
meeting to establish APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation), and
from 1989 to 1991 he played a leading role in developing the UN
peace plan for Cambodia. He also led the Australian government's
Chemical Weapons Convention initiatives. Among his publications
is the 1993 book, Cooperating for Peace: The Global Agenda for
the 1990s and Beyond.
Alexander
L. George is Graham H. Stuart Professor Emeritus of International
Relations at Stanford University. A leading academic specialist
on nuclear deterrence, crisis prevention and management, and coercive
diplomacy, Dr. George came to Stanford in 1968 after ten years at
the Rand Corporation, where he had been head of the social science
department. The most recent of his many scholarly publications are
Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to
War (1992) and Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice of Foreign
Policy (1993). Deterrence in American Foreign Policy,
which he co-authored with Richard Smoke, won the Bancroft Prize
in 1975. In 1983 he was the recipient of a MacArthur Foundation
Five-Year Prize Award.
Flora
MacDonald is the chairperson of the International Development
Research Centre in Ottawa. Miss MacDonald, a native of Nova Scotia,
served from 1972 to 1988 as member of parliament for Kingston and
the Islands (Ontario), during which time she held three cabinet
positions: secretary of state for external affairs, minister of
employment and immigration, and minister of communications. In 1989
the secretary-general of the United Nations appointed her to the
Eminent Persons' Group to study transnational corporations in South
Africa. She became chairperson of the International Development
Research Centre in 1992. In 1993 Miss MacDonald was named an Officer
of the Order of Canada.
Donald
F. McHenry is University Research Professor of Diplomacy and
International Affairs at Georgetown University. As U.S. permanent
representative to the United Nations from 1979 to 1981, Ambassador
McHenry was a member of President Jimmy Carter's cabinet. He had
served as U.S. deputy representative to the U.N. Security Council
from 1977 to 1979. He has represented the United States in a number
of other international forums and was the U.S. negotiator on the
question of Namibia. After eight years at the Department of State,
he joined the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in 1973
as a project director in Humanitarian Policy Studies. He has taught
at Southern Illinois, Howard, American, and Georgetown universities.
Olara
A. Otunnu is president of the International Peace Academy, an
independent institution based in New York and devoted to promoting
peacemaking and peacekeeping. Born in Mucwini, Uganda, Mr. Otunnu
received his education at King's College, Budo; Makerere University;
Oxford University, where he was an Overseas Scholar; and Harvard
University, where he was a Fulbright Scholar. He practiced and taught
law before serving successively as a member of the Uganda Consultative
Council (interim parliament), Uganda's Permanent Representative
to the United Nations, and Minister of Foreign Affairs. At the UN,
Mr. Otunnu served as President of the Security Council, Chairman
of the UN Commission on Human Rights, Chairman of the Contact Group
on Global Negotiations, and Vice President of the General Assembly.
Before assuming his present position, he returned to academia, doing
research and teaching in Paris. Mr. Otunnu is a member of the Commission
on Global Governance, the Club of Rome, and the Council of African
Advisers to the World Bank, and he also serves on the boards of
several organizations, including the Aspen Institute, the Carnegie
Endowment for World Peace, and Aspen Italia.
David
Owen is chairman of Humanitas, a charitable organization that
builds on the work of the Independent Commission on International
Humanitarian Issues, of which he was a member from 1983 to 1986.
From August 1992 to June 1995, he was the European Union co-chairman
of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia (Cyrus
Vance was the UN co-chairman until 1993). Lord Owen, who was made
a Life Baron in 1992, was a member of the House of Commons from
1966 to 1992. During that time, he played a leading role in British
politics, serving as foreign minister in the Labour government of
James Callahan and co-founding the Social Democratic Party, which
he led from 1983 to 1987 and again from 1988 to 1992. Lord Owen
was a member of the Palme Commission from 1980 to 1989.
Shridath
Ramphal, a former foreign minister of Guyana who was secretary-general
of the Commonwealth from 1975 to 1990, is co-chairman of the Commission
on Global Governance, whose report, The Global Neighborhood,
was published in January 1995. He chairs the board of the International
Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance in Stockholm and
the international steering committee of LEAD, the Leadership for
Environment and Development program. Sir Shridath is a member of
the council of the International Negotiating Network set up by former
U.S. president Jimmy Carter and of the board of Canada's International
Development Research Centre. He is also chancellor of the University
of the West Indies and of the University of Warwick in England.
In 1991 he was a special advisor to the secretary-general of the
UN Conference on Environment and Development--the Earth Summit--for
which he wrote the book Our Country the Planet: Forging a Partnership
for Survival.
Roald
Z. Sagdeev is Distinguished Professor in the department of physics
at the University of Maryland and director of the East-West Space
Science Center. Professor Sagdeev, whose area of special interest
is nonlinear physics and plasmas, is one of the world's leading
physicists. He was director of the Space Research Institute of the
USSR Academy of Sciences for fifteen years and was former president
Gorbachev's science advisor. In 1987-1988, he was chairman of the
Committee of Soviet Scientists for Global Security. Professor Sagdeev
was a People's Deputy of the USSR Congress, roughly the equivalent
of a delegate to the U.S. Constitutional Convention. He has long
been a strong and effective advocate of building bridges of understanding
between the superpowers.
John
D. Steinbruner has been director of the Foreign Policy Studies
program at the Brookings Institution since 1978. His research has
been focused on problems of international security. Before joining
Brookings, he held academic positions at Yale University, the John
F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology. Among the most recent of his many books
and monographs is A New Concept of Cooperative Security (1992);
he is also a major contributor to Global Engagement: Cooperation
and Security in the 21st Century (1994), which was edited by
Jan Nolan. His articles have appeared in such journals as Arms
Control Today, Foreign Affairs, Politique Internationale, and
Soviet Economy.
Brian
Urquhart has been scholar-in-residence in the Ford Foundation's
International Affairs Program since 1986, when he retired from the
United Nations. From 1939 to 1945 Sir Brian served in the British
Army in infantry and airborne units in North Africa and Europe.
His UN career began with the birth of the institution itself--from
1945 to 1946 he was personal assistant to Gladwyne Jebb, the executive
secretary of the Preparatory Commission of the United Nations in
London. He held many posts in his forty years with the UN: he was
personal assistant to Trygve Lie, the first secretary-general, for
three and a half years, and from 1954 to 1971, during the tenure
of Ralph J. Bunche, he served in various capacities in the Office
of the Under Secretary-General for Special Political Affairs, which
dealt with peacekeeping and conflict control. In 1974, Sir Brian
was appointed Under Secretary-General for Special Political Affairs,
a post he held until his retirement. As under secretary-general,
among his responsibilities was the direction of peacekeeping operations
and negotiations in Cyprus, the Middle East, Namibia , and other
conflict areas. The most recent of his many books are Ralph Bunche:
An American Life (1993) and (with Erskine Childers) Renewing
the United Nations System (1994).
John
C. Whitehead is chairman of AEA Investors Inc., a special situation
investment company. During the Reagan administration, Mr. Whitehead
was U.S. deputy secretary of state, under George Shultz, from 1985
to 1989. Among his areas of special interest were relations with
Eastern Europe and the United Nations. After service in the navy,
he began his professional career in 1947 at Goldman, Sachs &
Co., where he remained for thirty-eight years, becoming senior partner
and co-chairman in 1976; he retired from Goldman Sachs in late 1984.
He is chairman of the board of many institutions, including the
International Rescue Committee and the United Nations Association
of the U.S.A., and is chairman emeritus of the Brookings Institution.
Sahabzada
Yaqub-Khan has been the Special Representative of the United
Nations Secretary-General for the Western Sahara since 1992. He
retired from the Pakistan Army with the rank of Lieutenant General
in 1971 after a long and distinguished career that began even before
the establishment of Pakistan as an independent state. General Yaqub-Khan
served as Vice Chief of the General Staff, Commander Armoured Division,
Commandant of the Command and Staff College, Chief of the General
Staff, and Governor of East Pakistan. After his retirement, he embarked
on a career in international relations, first as ambassador to France
(1972-1973 and 1980-1982), the United States (1973-1979), and the
Soviet Union (1979-1980) and then as foreign minister between 1982
and 1991, a post that he held under six different governments.
Herbert
S. Okun, special advisor to the Commission, is executive director
of the Financial Services Volunteer Corps, a not-for-profit organization
that provides voluntary assistance to help the former Communist
countries of Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, and Asia establish
free-market financial systems. He is also the U.S. member of the
International Narcotics Control Board. Ambassador Okun's career
with the U.S. Department of State began in 1955. By the time he
retired from the Foreign Service in 1991, he had been an ambassador
to the United Nations and the German Democratic Republic, vice chairman
of the U.S. SALT II delegation and of the delegation to talks with
the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom on a Comprehensive Test
Ban, and political advisor to the NATO commander-in-chief for Southern
Europe. He had also served as special assistant to Secretary of
State William Rogers and as director of the Office of Soviet Union
Affairs.
David A. Hamburg, Co-chair
President
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Cyrus R. Vance, Co-chair
Partner
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Gro Harlem Brundtland
Prime Minister of Norway
Virendra Dayal
Member
Human Rights Commission of India
Gareth Evans
Minister for Foreign Affairs
Government of Australia
Alexander L. George
Graham H. Stuart
Professor Emeritus of International Relations
Stanford University
Flora MacDonald
Chair
International Development Research Center
Donald F. McHenry
University Research Professor of Diplomacy and International Affairs
Georgetown University
Olara A. Otunnu
President
International Peace Academy
David Owen
Co-chair of the International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia
Shridath Ramphal
Chancellor
University of the West Indies and University of Warwick
Roald Z. Sagdeev
Distinguished Professor
Department of Physics
University of Maryland
John D. Steinbruner
Director
Foreign Policy Studies Program
The Brookings Institution
Brian Urquhart
Scholar-in-Residence
International Affairs Program
The Ford Foundation
John C. Whitehead
Chairman
AEA Investors Inc.
Sahabzada Yaqub-Khan
Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for
the Western Sahara
Special
Advisor to the Commission
Herbert S. Okun
Executive Director
Financial Services Volunteer Corps
Jane. E. Holl, Executive Director
Morton Abramowitz
President
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Ali Abdullah Alatas
Minister for Foreign Affairs
Republic of Indonesia
Graham T. Allison
Douglas Dillon Professor of Government
John F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
Robert Badinter
President Emeritus
Constitutional Council of France
Harold Brown
Counselor
Center for Strategic and International Studies
McGeorge Bundy
Scholar-in-Residence
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Jimmy Carter
The Carter Center of Emory University
Lori Damrosch
Professor of Law
Columbia University School of Law
Francis M. Deng
Senior Fellow
Foreign Policy Studies Program
The Brookings Institution
Sidney D. Drell
Professor and Deputy Director
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
Stanford University
Lawrence S. Eagleburger
Senior Foreign Policy Advisor
Baker, Worthington, Crossley & Stansberry
Leslie H. Gelb
President
Council on Foreign Relations
David Gompert
Vice President
National Security Research
RAND Corporation
Andrew J. Goodpaster
Cochair
The Atlantic Council of the United States
Mikhail S. Gorbachev
The Gorbachev Foundation
James P. Grant*
Executive Director
United Nations Children's Fund
Lee H. Hamilton
United States House of Representatives
Theodore M. Hesburgh
President Emeritus
University of Notre Dame
Donald L. Horowitz
James B. Duke Professor of Law and Political Science
Duke University School of Law
Michael Howard
President
International Institute for Strategic Studies
Karl Kaiser
Director
Research Institute of the German Society for Foreign Affairs
Nancy Landon Kassebaum
United States Senate
Sol M. Linowitz
Honorary Chairman
The Academy for Educational Development
Richard G. Lugar
United States Senate
Michael Mandelbaum
Christian A. Herter Professor of American Foreign Policy
The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies
The Johns Hopkins University
Robert S. McNamara
Former U.S. Secretary of Defense
William H. McNeill
Professor Emeritus of History
University of Chicago
Sam Nunn
United States Senate
Olusegun Obasanjo
President
Africa Leadership Forum
Sadako Ogata
The High Commissioner for Refugees
United Nations
Javier PÍrez de Cuellar
Former Secretary-General
United Nations
Condoleezza Rice
Provost
Stanford University
Elliot L. Richardson
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy
Harold H. Saunders
Director of International Affairs
Kettering Foundation
George P. Shultz
Distinguished Fellow
Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace
Stanford University
Richard Solomon
President
United States Institute of Peace
James Gustave Speth
Administrator
United Nations Development Programme
Desmond Tutu
The Archbishop of Cape Town
James D. Watkins
President
Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc.
Elie Wiesel
University Professor and Andrew W. Mellon Professor in the Humanities
Boston University
I. William Zartman
Jacob Blaustein Professor of International Organizations and Conflict
Resolution
Director of the African Studies Program
The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies
The Johns Hopkins University
*
Deceased February 1995.
|