How to apply for a grant
Search grants
Program Guidelines and Priorities

 


New Directions for Carnegie Corporation of New York
A Report to the Board by Vartan Gregorian, President

February 2, 1999

Table of Contents
Carnegie Corporation 1911–98
1999 and Beyond
Education
International Peace and Security
International Development
Democracy
Special Projects

Carnegie Fellowship Program
21st Century Fund
Conclusion
References
In the history of institutions, changes in leadership have often provided opportunity for reflection on the purposes and policies of an organization and occasion for institutional renewal and rededication. Carnegie Corporation of New York is no exception. Soon after I joined the foundation as its president in June 1997, the program staff and I together undertook an in-depth review of the scope and effectiveness of our past and current grant programs to enlighten us as to our future course of action. While a detailed explanation of the review was provided in my 1997 annual report essay, Some Preliminary Thoughts, it is worth repeating that this process involved scores of educators, scholars, scientists, journalists, business leaders, program practitioners, public servants, presidents of universities and colleges, and the staff and leadership of many sister foundations and professional associations. Among other activities, the foundation held some twenty-six meetings eliciting comments about issues of importance and producing useful suggestions for our particular focus and approach. Following this phase in the review, we submitted our recommendations for future grantmaking to the trustees for discussion and approval. The plans correspond with our historical mission and legacy, maintain a balance between continuity and change, and stress our comparative advantage in certain areas. The new programs are intended to serve as a catalyst for change while taking the long view; they will seek partnerships in implementing programmatic objectives and priorities and incorporate a credible evaluation system and dissemination scheme. Internally, the structures for decision making will encourage maximum interaction and cooperation among the staff. The following provides a brief history of Carnegie Corporation; descriptions of the new programs can be found in the section 1999 and Beyond

CARNEGIE CORPORATION 1911–98

Historian and former Librarian of Congress Daniel Boorstin once remarked, "To try to create the future without some knowledge of the past is like trying to plant cut flowers." I agree with him. In looking back over the impressive eighty-eight-year record of the Corporation, it is plain we are not only reaffirming our historic role as an education foundation but also honoring Andrew Carnegie's passion for international peace and the health of our democracy. Carnegie established Carnegie Corporation of New York in 1911 "to promote the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding." While his primary aim was to benefit the people of the United States, he later determined to use a portion of the funds for members of the British overseas Commonwealth. With this mandate and an endowment of $125 million (later augmented by $10 million), Carnegie dedicated his foundation to eliminating one of the "greatest causes of social backwardness" — ignorance.

Carnegie was assuredly a creature of his times, yet he succeeded in enunciating the principles of philanthropy, as distinguished from charity, that are relevant today. To Carnegie, the aim should be "to do real and permanent good in this world." The obligation of the rich was the betterment of their fellows, by placing the "ladders on which the aspiring can rise." Libraries, museums, and universities were among the venues for reaching those "who have the divine spark even so feebly developed, that it may be strengthened and grow." A maverick capitalist, Carnegie argued against inherited wealth, calling it bad for both society and the beneficiaries. Wealth aggregation, he argued, was necessary for progress and civilization, for "through it unimaginable benefits would be put into the hands of many," but capitalists, "the anointed trustees of public wealth," had a social and moral duty to administer that wealth on behalf of their fellows during their lifetime. His verdict was: "The man who dies thus rich, dies disgraced. . . ." Carnegie gave away more than 90 percent of his wealth before he died in 1919.

Carnegie saw democracy, education, the diffusion of knowledge, and philanthropy as fundamental tools for strengthening the bonds among all people. In democracy he saw a form of government that provided equality before the law, freedom from authoritarian restriction, and equal representation. In education and the diffusion of knowledge, he saw the means to provide everyone with an opportunity to succeed and the pathway by which nations might come to resolve their conflicts peacefully, hearkening toward a new age of "universal civilization." Education was not only a basic instrument for the creation of new knowledge, but a pillar of democracy and a means for the enlightenment and self-improvement of individual citizens. In philanthropy he saw a way to bring all these elements together and to bridge the gulf that separated social and economic groups.

As a self-educated man and firm believer in popular education (his formal education ended at the age of twelve), Carnegie thought that access to books should be a part of the birthright of every youngster and that public libraries, still an innovation in American life, should be an indispensable civic institution. Carnegie and Carnegie Corporation spent $56 million to establish 2,509 public libraries, of which 1,681 were in the United States. In his relentless quest for new knowledge and world peace, Carnegie founded four trusts and three "temples of peace." Among them, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace was heavily supported by the Corporation, as were other operating foundations established by Carnegie, including The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (CFAT) and the Carnegie Institution of Washington.

Carnegie ran the Corporation himself in its first eight years, continuing to create public libraries and making gifts for church organs, buildings and endowments, and cultural organizations. In 1918, under an arrangement negotiated by Carnegie and the CFAT (which Carnegie had founded in 1905), the Corporation gave $1 million to found what has become one of the largest insurance companies in the world, the Teachers Insurance Annuity Association of America. (The nonprofit stock of the association, now called TIAA-CREF, was owned outright by the Corporation until 1938, when it was transferred to an independent board of trustees.)

In Carnegie's first letter of gift to the Corporation he made clear his wishes for its future: "Recognizing that no wise man will bind Trustees forever to certain paths, causes, or institutions, I disclaim any intention of doing so. On the contrary, I give my Trustees full authority to change policy or causes hitherto aided, from time to time, when this, in their opinion, has become necessary or desirable. They shall best conform to my wishes by using their own judgment."

Over the years the Corporation's leadership has tried to be true to these instructions, adapting its programs and priorities to changing circumstances. The foundation has contributed to the expansion of higher education and adult education; the advancement of research on learning and development in early childhood; the promotion of educational and public interest broadcasting; and the advancement of minorities and women in precollege and higher education. More recently it has furthered public understanding of the education and health needs of children in the first three years of life and of young adolescents and brought to public attention the risks of superpower confrontation, nuclear war, and ethnic and civil strife.

Following Carnegie's death, the Corporation began to align its programs with the more scientific assumptions that were coming to dominate social initiatives in the early part of this century. Convinced of the nation's need to increase scientific expertise and "scientific management," the Corporation sought to build centers of excellence in the natural and social sciences. Large grants were made to the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, the Carnegie Institution of Washington, the National Bureau of Economic Research, the Food Research Institute at Stanford University, and the Brookings Institution. At this time the Corporation also developed an interest in adult education and lifelong learning as a logical sequel to Carnegie's preoccupation with libraries as "the university of the people." In 1919 it initiated the vast Americanization Study to explore educational opportunities for adults, primarily new immigrants.

Under Frederick M. Keppel, president from 1923 to 1941, the Corporation shifted from the creation of public libraries to strengthening library infrastructure, services, and training and building the field of adult education, adding arts education to the array of programs in colleges and universities. The foundation's grantmaking during this period was marked by a certain eclecticism and a remarkable perseverance in its chosen causes. From the crash of 1929 through the Depression, Keppel stuck to his belief that a foundation should determine what, in the long run, should be the wisest use of the philanthropic dollar.

Keppel was behind the famous study of race relations in the United States by the Swedish social economist Gunnar Myrdal, deliberately appointing, in 1937, an "outsider" and a non-American to manage the study on the theory that the task should be undertaken by a fresh mind unencumbered by traditional attitudes or earlier conclusions. Widely heralded, Myrdal's book American Dilemma (1944) had no immediate public policy impact, although it was later heavily cited in legal challenges to segregation. In general, Keppel believed foundations should make the facts available to the public and let them speak for themselves, not directly or indirectly undertake to instruct the public as to what to do about them. His cogent writings about philanthropy left a lasting impression on the foundation field and influenced the organization and leadership of many new foundations.

In 1927 Keppel toured sub-Saharan Africa and recommended the first set of grants to establish public schools in East and southern Africa. Other grants were made for municipal library development in South Africa. In 1928 the Corporation launched the Carnegie Commission on the Poor White Problem in South Africa. Better known as the "Carnegie Poor White Study," it served to promote strategies for improving the position of rural Afrikaner whites. (The poverty, oppression, and political exclusion of South African blacks were explicitly addressed in the grant programs and in a second Carnegie inquiry during the late 1970s and early 1980s.)

World War II and its immediate aftermath were a relatively inactive period for the Corporation. When Charles Dollard, who had joined the staff in 1939 as Keppel's assistant, became president in 1948, the foundation deepened its interest in the social sciences, particularly the study of human behavior, and entered the field of international affairs. At Dollard's urging, the Corporation heavily supported quantitative, "objective" social science research modeled after the hard sciences and helped to diffuse the ideas throughout leading universities. At this time, the Corporation became a leading proponent of standardized testing in the schools as a means for determining academic merit irrespective of social or economic background. Among other initiatives, it helped to broker establishment of the Educational Testing Service in 1947. In recognition of the United States' rising need for scholarly and policy expertise in international affairs, the Corporation also launched, with the Ford Foundation, foreign area studies programs in colleges and universities, helping to establish and sustain the Russian Research Center at Harvard University. Following Afrikaner political ascendance in 1951, the Corporation ceased grantmaking in South Africa for more than two decades, turning its attention to the development of universities in East and West Africa.

Under John W. Gardner, who rose from a staff position to the presidency in 1955 (Gardner simultaneously became president of the CFAT, which was housed at the Corporation), the Corporation continued to upgrade scholarly competence in foreign area studies and strengthened its programs in liberal arts education. In the early 1960s, the Corporation inaugurated a program on continuing education, also supporting the development of new models for advanced and professional study tailored to the needs of mature women. Gardner's interest in leadership development led to creation of the White House Fellows program in 1964. Notable among the grant projects to strengthen higher education in sub-Saharan Africa was the 1959–60 Ashby Commission study of Nigeria's needs for postsecondary education, which had the effect of stimulating widespread aid to African nation's systems of higher and professional education from the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States. While Gardner's strong interest was education, as a psychologist he saw the value of the behavioral sciences in addressing societal and world problems. At his urging, the Corporation supported much of the nation's basic research on cognition, creativity, and the learning process, particularly among young children, in the process linking the fields of psychology and education. The Corporation's most important contribution to precollege education reform at this time was a series of studies of education carried out by James B. Conant, former president of Harvard University. In particular, Conant's study of the comprehensive American high school (1959) resolved a heavily polarized public debate over the purposes of public secondary education, making the case that schools could adequately educate both the academically gifted and the average student.

With Gardner, Carnegie Corporation entered the era of strategic philanthropy — the planned, organized, deliberately constructed means to attain stated ends. It no longer sufficed to support a socially desirable project; rather, the knowledge must produce concrete results and be communicated to the public, the media, and decision makers with the intention of fostering policy debate. A central objective was to develop programs that might be implemented and scaled up by larger organizations, especially government. The turn toward "institutional transfer" was partly in response to the relatively diminished power of the Corporation's resources, making it necessary to achieve "leverage" and "multiplier effects" if it was to have any impact at all. The Corporation saw itself more as a trendsetter in the world of philanthropy, often supporting research or providing seed money for ideas while others financed the more costly operations. As an example, the Corporation advanced the ideas leading to creation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, later adopted by the federal government. Declaring that a foundation's most precious asset was its sense of direction, Gardner gathered a competent professional staff of generalists whom he called his "cabinet of strategy," regarding it as important a resource for the Corporation as its endowment.

While Gardner's standpoint on educational equality was to multiply the channels through which the individual could pursue opportunity and excellence, it was under long-time staff member Alan Pifer, who became acting president in 1965 and president in 1967 (again of both the Corporation and the CFAT), that the foundation began to respond to the claims by historically disadvantaged groups, including women, for equal opportunity and treatment. The Corporation developed three interlocking objectives: prevention of educational disadvantage; equality of educational opportunity in the schools; and broadened opportunities in higher education. A fourth objective cutting across these programs was to improve the democratic performance of government. Grants were made to reform state government as the laboratories of democracy, underwrite voter education drives, and mobilize youth to vote, among other measures. Use of the legal system became a tool for achieving equal opportunity in education, as well as redress of grievance, and the Corporation joined the Ford and Rockefeller foundations and others in supporting educational litigation by civil rights organizations. It also launched a multifaceted program to train black lawyers in the South for the practice of public interest law and to increase the legal representation of blacks.

Maintaining its commitment to early childhood education, the Corporation supported the application of research knowledge in experimental and demonstration programs — programs that subsequently provided strong evidence of the positive long-term effects of high-quality early education, particularly for the disadvantaged. An influential study upholding the value of early education was the Perry Preschool Project of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. Its 1980 report on the progress of sixteen-year-olds who had been enrolled in the experimental preschool programs was crucial in safeguarding Project Head Start at a time when federal social programs were being scaled back. The foundation also promoted educational children's television, launching the Children's Television Workshop, producer of Sesame Street and other noted children's educational programs. Growing recognition of the power of television as an educator prompted formation of the Carnegie Commission on Educational Television, whose recommendations were adopted in the Public Broadcasting Act of 1968 establishing the public broadcasting system. Among the many reports on American education financed during this time, including Charles E. Silberman's acclaimed Crisis in the Classroom (1971), undoubtedly the most controversial was Christopher Jencks' Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America (1973). The timing of this report, which confirmed quantitative research (e.g, the Coleman Report) showing a weak relationship of public school resources to educational outcomes, corresponded with the foundation's burgeoning interest in improving the effectiveness of schools.

Reentering South Africa in the mid-1970s, the Corporation worked through universities to increase the legal representation of blacks and build the practice of public interest law. At the University of Cape Town, it established the Second Carnegie Inquiry into Poverty and Development in Southern Africa, this time to examine the legacies of apartheid and make recommendations to nongovernmental organizations for actions commensurate with the long-run goal of achieving a democratic, interracial society.

The influx of nontraditional students and "baby boomers" into higher education prompted formation of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1967), supported under the aegis of the CFAT. (In 1972, the CFAT became an independent institution after experiencing three decades of restricted control over its own affairs.). In its more than ninety reports, the commission made detailed suggestions for introducing more flexibility into the structure and financing of higher education. One outgrowth of the commission's work was creation of the federal Pell grants program offering tuition assistance for needy college students. The Corporation promoted the Doctor of Arts "teaching" degree as well as various off-campus undergraduate degree programs, including the Regents Degree of the State of New York and Empire State College. The foundation's combined interest in testing and higher education resulted in establishment of a national system of college credit by examination (College-Level Entrance Examination Program of the College Entrance Examination Board). Building on its past programs to promote the continuing education of women, the foundation made a series of grants for the advancement of women in academic life. Two other study groups formed to examine critical problems in American life were the Carnegie Council on Children (1972) and the Carnegie Commission on the Future of Public Broadcasting (1977), the latter formed almost ten years after the first commission.

David A. Hamburg, a physician, educator, and scientist with a public health background, took the helm in late 1982 with the intention of mobilizing the best scientific and scholarly talent and thinking around "the prevention of rotten outcomes" — all the way from early childhood to international relations. The Corporation moved away from higher education, placing priority on the education and healthy development of children and adolescents and the preparation of youth for a scientific and technological, knowledge-driven world. In 1984, the Corporation established the Carnegie Commission on Education and the Economy. Through its major publication, A Nation Prepared (1986), the foundation reaffirmed the role of the teacher as the "best hope" for ensuring educational excellence in elementary and secondary education. An outgrowth of that report was establishment, a year later, of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards to consider ways of attracting able candidates to the teaching profession and recognizing and retaining them. At the Corporation's initiative, the American Association for the Advancement of Science issued two groundbreaking reports, Science for All Americans (1989) and Benchmarks for Science Literacy (1993), which recommended a common core of learning in science, mathematics, and technology for all citizens and helped set national standards of achievement in these domains.

An entirely new focus for the Corporation was the danger to world peace posed by the superpower confrontation and weapons of mass destruction. The foundation underwrote scientific study of the feasibility of the proposed federal Strategic Defense Initiative and joined the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation in supporting the analytic work of a new generation of arms control and nuclear nonproliferation experts. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Corporation grants helped promote the concept of cooperative security among erstwhile adversaries and projects to build democratic institutions in the former Soviet Union and central Europe. An important undertaking was the Prevention of Proliferation Task Force, coordinated under a grant to the Brookings Institution, which inspired the Nunn–Lugar Amendment to the Soviet Threat Reduction Act of 1991 aimed at dismantling Soviet nuclear weapons and reducing proliferation risks. More recently, the Corporation has addressed the problems of interethnic and regional conflict and supported projects seeking to diminish the risks of a wider war stemming from civil strife. Two Carnegie commmissions, one on Reducing the Nuclear Danger (1990), the other on Preventing Deadly Conflict (1994), together addressed the full range of dangers associated with human conflict and the use of weapons of mass destruction. The Corporation's thrust in Commonwealth Africa, meanwhile, shifted to women's health and leadership development and the application of science and technology, including new information systems, in fostering research and expertise within indigenous scientific institutions and universities.

Under Hamburg, dissemination achieved even greater primacy in the arsenal of strategic philanthropy. Emphasis was on consolidation and diffusion of the best available knowledge from social science and education research and the use of such research in improving social policy and practice. Major partners in these endeavors were leading institutions that had the capability to influence public thought and action. If "change agent" was a key term in Pifer's time, "linkage" became the byword in Hamburg's, when the Corporation increasingly used its convening powers to bring together leaders and experts across disciplinary and sectoral boundaries to forge policy consensus and promote collaboration.

Continuing tradition, the foundation established in its name several other major study groups, often led by the president and managed by a special staff. Three groups covered the educational and developmental needs of children and youth from birth to age fifteen: the Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development (1986), the Carnegie Task Force on Meeting the Needs of Young Children (1991), and the Carnegie Task Force on Learning in the Primary Grades (1994). Another, the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government (1988), recommended ways that government at all levels could make more effective use of science and technology in their operations and policies. Jointly with the Rockefeller Foundation, the Corporation also financed the National Commission on Teaching & America's Future, whose report, What Matters Most (1996), provided a framework and agenda for teacher education reform across the country. Characteristically these study groups drew on the knowledge generated by the grant programs and from relevant fields and inspired followup grantmaking to implement the recommendations.

Next Page: 1999 and Beyond