|

Press
Releases
For further information contact:
Office of Public Affairs
(212) 207-6273
CLASS
OF 2004 CARNEGIE SCHOLARS ANNOUNCED
Fifteen
Scholars Chosen for Innovative Scholarships in Education, International
Development, Strengthening U.S. Democracy and International Peace
and Security
New York, NY—May 7, 2004. Carnegie Corporation of
New York announced the appointment of the latest class of Carnegie
Scholars, each of whom will receive up to $100,000 for a period
of up to two years to pursue research advancing the strategic work
of the Corporation. They join 52 others awarded fellowships since
2000.
This
year’s fifteen scholars, chosen in a highly competitive process,
will explore issues critical to economic growth and human development,
the American electoral process, political theory of international
law, school reform in an international perspective, a reconsideration
of the Iran hostage crisis, the logic of suicide terrorism, local
control and federal reform of education, how U.S. transatlantic
relations can remain relevant and effective, Hispanic students’
achievements in elementary education, justice in education, political
obligations in World War I America, the rise of far-right extremist
groups and the role masculinity plays in their resurgence, the role
of the United States in the 21st century, and the rebirth of democracy
in Iraq.
“The
annual announcement of the Carnegie Scholars is an opportunity to
celebrate original and creative thinking on a wide array of social
issues important to the Corporation’s strategies,” said
Vartan Gregorian, president of Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Gregorian
inaugurated the Scholars Program in 1999 to support innovative andpathbreaking
scholarship on issues related to the Corporation’s four program
areas. “It was my concern with understanding not only our
rights as Americans but also our obligations to our nation and our
communities that led me to establish a specific niche for scholarship
at the Corporation by recognizing and supporting scholars of vision,
with the intent not only of increasing knowledge but also to use
the insights gained from the scholars’ work to inform and
enrich the foundation’s programs. I believe that excellent
scholarship is a prerequisite for solid policy research and, ultimately,
effective social change.”
The
15 Carnegie Scholars, their institutions and research titles are:
Larry
Bartels, Princeton University
“Promoting Public Understanding of the American Electoral
Process”
Bill
Berkeley, Columbia University
“The Iran Hostage Crisis”
Harry
Brighouse, University of Wisconsin
“Justice in Education: Principles and Institutional Reform”
Christopher
Capozzola, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
“Uncle Sam Wants You: Political Obligations in World War I
America”
Adeed
Dawisha, Miami University of Ohio
“The Resuscitation of Iraqi Democracy”
Oona
A. Hathaway, Yale Law School
“Between Power and Principle: A Political Theory of International
Law”
Michael
Kimmel, State University of New York, Stony Brook
“Globalization and its Mal(e)contents: The Gendered Moral
and Political Economy of the Extreme Right”
Michael
Mandelbaum, Johns Hopkins University
“America the Hegemon: The United States in the World of the
Twenty-First Century”
Robert
A. Pape, University of Chicago
“The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism”
Charles
M. Payne, Duke University
“School Reform in International Perspective”
Richard
H. Pildes, New York University Law School
“The Constitutionalization of Democratic Politics”
Gustav
Ranis, Yale University
“The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Human Development”
Sean
F. Reardon, The Pennsylvania State University
“Hispanic Students’ Achievement in the Elementary Grades”
Douglas
S. Reed, Georgetown University
“Local Control and Federal Reform of Education: The Politics
of Implementing No Child Left Behind”
Elizabeth
Sherwood-Randall, Stanford University
“Transforming Transatlantic Relations: A New Agenda for a
New Era”Project descriptions for each scholar are attached
to this release.
The
Corporation names up to 20 Carnegie Scholars annually. Fellowships
are awarded for a period of up to two years, depending upon the
nature and design of the research. The maximum amount of the award
is $100,000. At the end of each fellowship, Carnegie Scholars will
submit written reports to the Corporation, which may then assist
in disseminating those results.
Scholars Program candidates are identified by a distinguished pool
of nominators and then evaluated by committees including both Carnegie
Corporation program leaders and external advisors. Four external
academic advisors reviewed the final proposals and recommended the
selection of awardees to the president. “Criteria for selection
were based on stringent academic standards and the relevance of
the project to Corporation program priorities,” said Neil
Grabois, vice president and director for strategic planning and
program coordination at Carnegie Corporation of New York, who facilitated
the various levels of deliberations. “The program’s
definition of excellence incorporates demonstrating intellectual
risk-taking, framing unusual questions, possessing the capacity
to communicate clearly and effectively on complex themes and advancing
scholarship in the Corporation’s programs.”
From an initial group of 144 nominees, 54 were invited to provide
complete proposals. Fifteen finalists were approved by the president
and presented to Carnegie Corporation’s board of trustees.
Patricia
Rosenfield, chair of Carnegie Corporation’s Scholars Program
and special advisor to the vice president and director for strategic
planning and program coordination, noted that, “This new group
of scholars is a strong collection of extraordinarily creative individuals.
We hope the awards will enable them to explore lines of inquiry
that move beyond the parameters of the institutional grants program
and provide them with new freedom and opportunity to use their imaginations
and arrive at fresh ideas that can advance social issues.”
Carnegie Corporation of New York was created by Andrew Carnegie
in 1911 to promote "the advancement and diffusion of knowledge
and understanding." As a grantmaking foundation, the Corporation
seeks to carry out Carnegie's vision of philanthropy, which he said
should aim "to do real and permanent good in the world."
The Corporation's capital fund, originally donated at a value of
about $135 million, had a market value of $1.8 billion on September
30, 2003. The Corporation awards grants totaling approximately $80
million a year in the areas of education, international peace and
security, international development and strengthening U.S. democracy.
2004 Carnegie Scholars Project Descriptions
Larry
Bartels
Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ
“Promoting
Public Understanding of the American Electoral Process”
Bartels,
an accomplished scholar of politics and public affairs, will highlight
how American elections actually work, and how election outcomes
shape the lives of ordinary citizens. He will base his arguments
on the fact that elections are substantive political struggles with
outcomes that are primarily determined not by which candidate has
the cleverest “spin,” the biggest bankroll, the slickest
ads or the most charisma, but by the state of the country, the enduring
bipartisan loyalties of the electorate and the positions of the
candidates on major issues of public policy. In the months leading
to the 2004 election, he will write op-ed pieces, conduct interviews
and plan a major conference to attempt to reorient public thinking
about the electoral process. In the months following the election,
he proposes to complete a non-technical book examining the lessons
of 2004 in light of recent scholarly work on the electoral process.
His overall aim is to elevate the level of public discourse about
American campaigns and elections, making it simultaneously more
realistic and more supportive of healthy civic engagement.
Bill
Berkeley
Adjunt Professor of International Affairs
Columbia University
New York, NY
“The
Iran Hostage Crisis”
Berkeley
is a scholar-journalist whose research, reporting and writing penetrate
to the core of important public issues. He plans to write a book
about the Iran hostage crisis as seen from the vantage point of
a generation later. It will focus on the careers of the surviving
Iranian hostage-takers who are now middle-aged, some of whom have
emerged as prominent figures in Iran’s embattled reformist
movement, in vehement opposition to the ruling clerics in whose
name they acted in their youth. Several have been jailed. One, a
journalist, has been in solitary confinement for the last year,
accused, in part, of spying for the United States. Another was shot
and critically wounded by state agents. A third is now the highest-ranking
woman in President Mohammad Khatami’s Reformist cabinet. The
aim of Berkeley’s book is to reexamine the Iran hostage crisis—which
became a historic confrontation—with the benefit of hindsight,
using the reporting and narrative tools of a working journalist.
Harry
Brighouse
Professor of Philosophy and Affiliate Professor of Education Policy
Studies
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI
“Justice
in Education: Principles and Institutional Reform”
Brighouse
has a distinguished record of scholarship and public service on
issues of education and justice. He will use his fellowship to write
a book titled Justice in Education: Principles and Institutional
Reform in which he will consider the implications of justice principles
for school system governance and school curricula. He will elaborate
and defend a theory of social justice in education and evaluate
structural and curricular school reforms that are currently at the
forefront of education policy in the United States (e.g., education
for democratic citizenship, religious education, statewide or national
standards) in the light of this theory. He will approach the topic
by examining domestic and international educational reforms and
illuminating significant contextual differences that may affect
justice outcomes.
Christopher
Capozzola
Assistant Professor of History
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, MA
“Uncle
Sam Wants You: Political Obligations in World War I America”
Capozzola, a specialist on the political and cultural history of
the United States from 1861 to 1945, is working on a book titled
Uncle Sam Wants You: Political Obligations in World War I America,
in which he will combine political theory and social history to
explore political obligation in the United States during World War
I. He aims to demonstrate, through his research, the centrality
of obligation in American political life in the 20th century. His
work will examine military conscription and its enforcement, voluntary
associations and their dual roles in war mobilization and homefront
repression, and the rise of legal understandings of civil liberties
and citizenship rites. Along with the completion of the book, he
plans to use his research to publish general-interest teaching materials
on democratic citizenship in wartime.
Adeed
Dawisha
Professor of Political Science
Miami University of Ohio
Oxford, OH
“The
Resuscitation of Iraqi Democracy”
Dawisha
is a scholar of international repute specializing in democratization
and Middle Eastern politics. In the first part of his project, he
will conduct a historical inquiry into the role political institutions
have played since Iraq became a state in 1921. He will evaluate
the relatively liberal and pluralistic institutions that existed
in the monarchcal period (1921-1954), and then analyze the fault
lines and weaknesses that eventually led to the demise of the liberal
phase and its replacement by four decades of authoritarian rule.
The second part of his project builds on the first. He will explore,
in his book-length, manuscript, the democratic forms and modalities
that would be best suited to post-Saddam Iraq in the light of the
country’s historical and social imperatives.
Oona
A. Hathaway
Associate Professor
Yale Law School
New Haven, CT
“Between
Power and Principle: A Political Theory of International Law”
Hathaway,
a talented young scholar studying international law and politics,
will examine why states commit to and comply with international
law. She intends to put forward a theory of international law that
builds upon existing international legal and political science scholarship,
yet moves beyond it in emphasizing the role of domestic institutions
and non-legal incentives, as well as the reciprocal influence of
states’ commitment decisions on their compliance behavior.
To test her theoretical predictions about state behavior, she will
collect and analyze extensive data in three areas—human rights,
the environment and trade. She will then use the findings of her
research to write a book and academic articles drawing conclusions
about how international law can be designed more effectively.
Michael
Kimmel
Professor of Sociology
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY
“Globalization
and its Mal(e)contents: The Gendered Moral and Political Economy
of the Extreme Right”
Kimmel
is an eminent sociologist working on gender and masculinity studies.
His proposed research will provide a comparative analysis of far-right
extremist groups in the U.S., Scandinavia and Britain and will emphasize
how the concept of masculinity is employed in the alarming resurgence
of such groups. Based on extensive archival research and more than
100 interviews with leaders and participants, as well as with law
enforcement and public officials, he shows how groups members see
their situation in gendered terms, and use masculinity to criticize
“others” as well as to recruit new members. Drawn largely
from declining lower-middle-class families, these groups mobilize
“whiteness” in the service of repairing a damaged masculinity
and restoring a sense of male entitlement, he finds. He will use
his award to complete his research and write a book along with a
series of scholarly and more popular articles based on the research.
Michael
Mandelbaum
Professor and Director of the Department of American Foreign Policy
Johns Hopkins University
Washington, D.C.
“America
the Hegemon: The United States in the World of the Twenty-First
Century”
Mandelbaum,
an American foreign policy expert, intends to write a book arguing
that the United States performs, for the society of sovereign states,
tasks similar to those that governments carry out within their countries.
The book will analyze how the United States came to be in this position;
describe in detail the American role in both international security
affairs and in the global economy; explore the obstacles, both within
and outside the United States, to the continuation of the American
role; and discuss the alternatives to it. He will tackle the question
of how to share the burden of global governance more broadly; that
is, how to carry out in a more collective fashion the governmental
tasks that the United States now discharges largely alone. Beyond
his book, Mandelbaum intends to disseminate his findings through
print media, radio and television.
Robert
A. Pape
Associate Professor of Political Science
University of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637
“The
Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism”
Pape,
a political scientist, intends to produce a book-length project,
entitled The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism, an exploration
into the social bases of terrorist activity worldwide. He acknowledges
the fact that suicide terrorism has been on the rise around the
world for two decades, but there is great confusion as to why; and
many such attacks—including those of September 11th, 2001—have
been perpetrated by Muslim terrorists, leading many to an explanation
that presumes that Islamic fundamentalism is the central cause.
However, this assumptive connection between suicide terrorism and
Islamic fundamentalism is misleading, and may be encouraging domestic
and foreign policies that are likely to worsen America’s situation,
he explains. As part of his study, he proposes to compile and analyze
the universe of suicide terrorist attacks worldwide from 1980 to
2002—188 in all. His preliminary data has shown that there
is little connection between suicide terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism,
or any religion for that matter. He has found that that what all
suicide terrorist campaigns have in common is a specific secular
and strategic goal: to compel liberal democracies to withdraw military
forces from territory that the terrorists claim to be their homeland.
His book will therefore present a comprehensive theory elucidating
the conditions that have generated suicide terrorism in the past
in order to better forecast when it is likely to emerge in the future.
It will also make concrete recommendations for democratic states
to promote their security and protect their individual liberties
without producing an incentive structure for terrorists.
Charles
M. Payne
Dalton Professor of African American Studies, History and Sociology
Duke University
Durham, NC
“School
Reform in International Perspective”
Payne, an established scholar on urban education and on the recent
historical experience of African Americans in the South, will build
on his interest in urban education reform and educational inequalities
to look at education reforms in international settings in order
to illuminate the challenges to urban school reform in the United
States. Based on the premise that educators who are working to improve
schools for disadvantaged children in this country tend to know
little about similar struggles elsewhere, his project will compare
the reform discourse in other countries to the discussion in the
United States, with particular emphases on how racial and ethnic
differences in achievement manifest themselves. His research will
involve four case studies: West Indians in Britain, Algerians in
France, the Roma in Central Europe and both Koreans and Burakumin
in Japan. Based on his research, he intends to write a book, aimed
at educators, policymakers and the general public.
Richard
H. Pildes
An-Bryce Professor of Law
New York University Law School
New York, NY
“The
Constitutionalization of Democratic Politics”
Pildes,
a leading theorist of public law and a specialist in legal issues
affecting democracy, proposes to research and write a book-length
study on the relationship between democratic politics and constitutional
law in the design of democracy itself. Building on the creation
of the “law of democracy” as a field of study in its
own right by himself and other scholars, he intends to produce a
book that will reach a broad audience of policymakers, judges and
students of democracy and constitutional law, in both the United
States and other constitutional democracies. His aim is to re-direct
judicial inquiry toward the question of whether the regulations
of democracy foster robustly competitive politics or are a means
of diminishing such competition in order to entrench existing partisan
and incumbent forces.
Gustav
Ranis
Henry L. Luce Director, Yale Center for International and Area Studies
and the Frank Altschul Professor of International Economics
Yale University
New Haven, CT
“The
Relationship Between Economic Growth and Human Development”
A focal
point in the current efforts of accomplished economist Ranis’
work is the relationship between economic growth and human development
in developing countries. He intends to examine the two-way relationship
between these forces, starting with the premise that human development,
defined in terms of some quality of life indices (e.g., health,
literacy, life expectancy), represents the bottom line objective
of human activity, while economic growth provides the necessary
resources. He will therefore examine two causal chains, one running
from economic growth to human development, with governments and
families as main actors, the other from human development to economic
growth, with the main focus on the quality of the human capital
stock, the investment ratio and the choice of foreign and domestic
technology. His preliminary investigation has indicated that in
order to reach the desired state of mutually reinforcing upward
movements in both human development and economic growth, giving
sequential priority to changes in human development is essential.
In order to arrive at the policy implications of this finding, he
will examine the experience of various types of developing countries
over four decades (1960-2000) in an attempt to isolate the critical
variables determining the strength of each chain. He will disseminate
his findings in both academic and policymaking circles by presenting
papers at seminars and writing scholarly articles.
Sean
F. Reardon
Assistant Professor of Education and Sociology
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA
“Hispanic
Students’ Achievement in the Elementary Grades”
Reardon,
a promising young scholar, teaches and conducts research on educational
inequality, school and residential segregation and the effects of
neighborhood conditions on child and adolescent development. He
plans to use his fellowship to support a program of research on
the experiences, achievement and English proficiency of Hispanic
children in the elementary (K-5) school years. His research will
culminate in a book, and will produce detailed descriptions of Hispanic
students’ achievement trajectories over the elementary school
years, with particular attention to how these trajectories differ
by immigrant generation, country of origin and English proficiency.
His research will also produce estimates of the causal effects of
classroom language and instructional practices on Hispanic students’
achievement and English proficiency in order to develop evidence-based
policy recommendations to improve educational opportunities for
Hispanic students. He will use statistical analyses as well as case
studies and qualitative interviews conducted in a group of schools
serving large proportions of Hispanic immigrant students to inform
his research.
Douglas
S. Reed
Associate Professor of Government
Georgetown University
Washington, D.C.
“Local
Control and Federal Reform of Education: The Politics of Implementing
No Child Left Behind”
Reed,
an accomplished political scientist, asks the question: What is
the meaning of local control in public education in the United States
today? He seeks to understand how, given the U.S.’s historical
commitment to local control, the recent No Child Left Behind Act
is reshaping the norms, institutions, practices and rhetoric of
local control of education as it builds a robust accountability
structure for America’s schools and school districts. By examining
the local sources of opposition to the Title I school choice and
school restructuring features of No Child Left Behind and exploring
school district and state-level implementation of the act, he proposes
to come to a clearer understanding of the possibilities and limitations
of a federal-led education reform that significantly alters the
traditional localist orientation of public education. He will publish
his findings both in a book and other academic and policy-oriented
articles.
Elizabeth
Sherwood-Randall
Senior Research Scholar
Stanford University
Stanford, CA
“Transforming
Transatlantic Relations: A New Agenda for a New Era”
Sherwood-Randall,
a leading expert on national security issues and U.S. foreign and
defense policy, plans to develop a policy study on the future of
U.S. transatlantic relationships. She will base her study on the
following assumptions: for more than half a century, the U.S. has
invested in building strong international alliances to protect American
security; the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has been
the anchor of the U.S. network of relationships, binding democracies
together to face common challenges; today NATO’s future is
in doubt, and the bilateral relationships that constitute it are
severely strained; paradoxically, America needs allies and partners
now more than ever. Her study will therefore seek to understand
the elements of continuity and change in the global security environment
in order to determine whether and how NATO can remain relevant and
effective. She intends to publish the results of her study in a
journal-length article as well as a variety of policy memoranda
for appropriate officials at the U.S. National Security Council,
State Department, Department of Defense, U.S. Congress, U.S. Mission
to NATO.
|