
Conclusion
In retrospect, the Corporation’s commitment over the past
two decades to supporting independent work related to Russia and Eurasia
was unstinting. Though clearly not the only foundation working in the
area, Carnegie Corporation stood out for the longevity of its focused
support for U.S.-Russian projects. Guided by the visions of two Corporation
presidents and strategic iterations of four major grantmaking programs,
the Corporation adroitly navigated constantly shifting terrain to unite
policymakers, academics, scientists and publics in the U.S., Russia, and
the NIS in pursuit of mutual interests and understanding. This experience
evolved from a necessary focus on penetrating the dangerous Cold War mentality
and coping with concerns for averting nuclear war in both the U.S. and
Soviet Union, to solidifying true partnership on a broad range of contemporary
hard and soft global security issues. Whereas the Corporation’s
success at the former placed a premium on engaging elites and nurturing
bright lights in respective scholarly and policy communities, it has since
made valuable contributions towards integrating the region into the Euro-Atlantic
community by spreading the seeds of new opportunities for knowledge and
interaction across Russian and NIS societies. Although the business of
transformation in Eurasia remains unfinished, it is clear that Carnegie
Corporation exhibited remarkable dexterity at staying the course in good
times and bad times of the bilateral relationship, leveraging relatively
modest investments for enduring impact on the region and U.S.-Russia relations.
Copyright information | Masthead
| Carnegie Corporation of New York web site
|