Carnegie Corporation of New York Print page | Mail page| High-bandwidth page
Search | Carnegie Corporation home page | Literacy home page


Resources: By Topic | By Audience | By Format
 
 

Adolescent Literacy and English Language Learners

Carnegie Reporter: Educating Immigrant Students

Double the Work: Challenges and Solutions to Acquiring Language and Academic Literacy for Adolescent English Language Learners

Measures of Change: The Demography and Literacy of Adolescent English Learners

 

ELL reports from
the Center on Instruction


Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners:
Research-Based Recommendations for Instruction and Academic Interventions


Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners:
Research-Based Recommendations for Serving Adolescent Newcomers

Practical Guidelines for the Education of English Language Learners:
Research-Based Recommendations for the Use of Accommodations in Large-Scale Assessments

 

   
The State of Adolescent Literacy Today

Which Adolescents Are Most At Risk?

“In today’s data-happy era of accountability, testing and No Child Left Behind, here is the most astonishing statistic in the whole field of education: an increasing number of researchers are saying that 1 out of 3 public high school students won’t graduate, not just in Shelbyville but around the nation. For Latinos and African Americans, the rate approaches an alarming 50%. Virtually no community, small or large, rural or urban, has escaped the problem.”
-- Nathan Thorbough, “Dropout Nation” in the April 9, 2006 issue of Time Magazine1


 

Suggested Reading

Diane August and Timothy Shanahan (Eds.). Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006.

Lucy Hood. Immigrant Students, Urban High Schools: The Challenge Continues. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2003.

Anne Grosse de León. “The Urban High School’s Challenge: Ensuring Literacy for Every Child.” New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2002.

Andrés Henríquez. Principals Can Help Improve Literacy for English Learners. National Association of Secondary School Principals, NewsLeader, December 2006.

Creating a Culture of Literacy: A Guide for Middle and High School Principals. Reston VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals, 2005.

President George W. Bush’s “Education: The Promise of America — Education Policy Book” begins by restating a core part of the American identity, “Education has always been a fundamental part of achieving the American Dream. An educated citizen is more likely to hold a good job, escape poverty, own a home, start a business, be free from crime, and participate in America's democracy.2” For generations, the world’s “tired, poor and huddled masses yearning to breathe free3” have traveled to America in the belief that this voyage would enable them to make this dream a reality for their children.

A key plank of the Bush Administration’s education policy is the “No Child Left Behind” Act, which holds schools accountable for delivering measurably effective literacy training through third grade. This act has brought enormous change to American elementary education. But with less emphasis being placed on teaching students who have been taught to read in kindergarten through third grade to “read to learn” in fourth to twelfth grades, today’s secondary schools are not serving as an effective launching pad to the American dream for enough children of immigrants. Nor are they serving as an effective launching pad to the American dream for enough native-born African-American, Latino, low-income, urban or learning disabled students.4

How badly are our schools failing these students?
  • “A 2004 report compiled jointly by the Harvard Civil Rights Project, the Urban Institute and Advocates for Children of New York found that the graduation rate was 50 percent for African Americans, 51 percent for American Indians and 53 percent for Hispanics. For whites and Asian students, it was 75 percent and 77 percent respectively.”5

  • African-American and Latino youth, students from low-income families, students from urban “On the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills in 2002, 66% of limited English proficient (LEP) 10th graders met the minimum expectations on the reading test- 28% below the percentage of students from the total population meeting those expectations…English language learners have some of the highest drop-out rates and are more frequently placed in lower ability groups and academic tracks than language majority students (Latinos in Education, 1999; Ruiz-de-Velasco & Fix, 2000; Steinberg & Almeida, 2004).”6

  • “According to the National Center for Education Statistics, kids from the lower income quarter are more than six times as likely to drop out of high school as kids from the highest.”7

  • 24% of dropouts cited needing to work to earn money as the reason for their decision.8

  • “Whereas 38 percent of 4th graders nationally were below basic on the 2002 NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress)- i.e., could not meet the standard for their grade- the percentages ranged from 52 percent to 69 percent in six large urban districts.”9

  • “More than one in ten students are now identified for special education services.”10

  • As of 2001, 37.2 percent of students with disabilities had been suspended or expelled from school and roughly 24 percent of students with disabilities reported being physically attacked at school.11
And, while students listed in the subgroups above are at particularly high risk for receiving low reading test scores and — as a corollary — dropping out of high school, the picture for the fourth to twelfth grade population of the country as a whole is not notably less bleak:
  • Approximately 8 million of the 32.5 million students in fourth through twelfth grade read below the National Assessment of Educational Progress’s minimum or “basic” standards for their grade level. (Analysis of the National Center for Education Statistics, 2003)

  • Only 31 percent of eighth graders and 34 percent of twelfth graders meet the National Assessment of Educational Progress standard of reading “proficiency” for their grade level. (National Assessment of Educational Progress, 2002)
These are alarming statistics. The days in which a mediocre or disinterested student could drop out of high school and hope to attain lifetime financial security at a company like General Motors or Ford are largely over. As we move into the twenty-first century, it is ever more necessary for young people to be educated not only in reading, but also in reading to learn…so that they are prepared to get and keep jobs that will support themselves and their families (“and, dare I say it — …fulfill their own happiness.”12) Yet while it may be ever more necessary, young people are not graduating from our schools equipped to read to learn:

What can be done about this problem? Carnegie Corporation of New York is committed to exploring this question.

Next: Carnegie Corporation’s Advancing Literacy Initiative


Top | Contents
 
 

© 2006 Carnegie Corporation of New York